Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Jarrett Shaefer writer of Chapter 27...pure Jerk-Off

Jarrett Shaefer is such a jerk-off, I can't even handle it.
I'm only reposting this because it shows what an ass we're dealing with.

Matthew Caldwell
Creative Director, HP Newsgram

Remember the day the music died? December 8, 1980 - John Lennon was shot and killed outside his home in NYC by MDC The film Chapter 27 takes us into the mind of Mark David Chapman and his three days of dementia in New York City. I met with director Jarrett Schaefer and Producer Bob Salerno and asked them some questions about the film …

Q: Tell us about your film:

JS: It’s about 3 days in New York City, Dec 6th through 8th. Following the man who’s going to shoot and kill John Lennon.

Q: There’s a controversial buzz around this film. What’s your opinion of the controversy?

JS: Yes, there is a controversy because this is a painful wound for the whole world. We know the controversy is because people feel this murderer should not get any further attention. But I feel like if we do discuss this terrible event and search for answers to understand why this happened, it’s a victory that may be available for us.

BS: I agree there is controversy, but I don’t know if I agree with it. This man shot John Lennon and the entire world knows his name. I don’t think our movie will make him more famous. It doesn’t glorify Mark Chapman nor vilify him. Instead it shows what happened these three days in 1980.

Mark Chapman was caught and pleaded guilty right away. So there was no trial. And people didn’t really get to discover just what went on. At the end of it all, there really isn’t an answer as to why Mark Chapman did it.

I don’t think we’ve done anything to harm the memory of John Lennon and what he stood for.

It’s important for people to know about this event. There was a whole generation of people who weren’t alive then.

Q: I didn’t know anything about Mark Chapman. For instance his obsession with Catcher in the Rye. How did you do your research on this person?

JS: We tried to be very accurate and factual with our depiction of Chapman. We may have moved one event that occurred in the day to the night…for filming purposes but we invented very little.

The NYC Police gathered much of the info. Their police statement provides the details. Chapman’s own account during parole hearings are available, and Jack Jones wrote a book called “Let Me Take You Down” that has many details from his 200 hours interviewing Chapman. Furthermore… he was interviewed on Larry King Live and in People Magazine. This is a very well-documented three days.

Q: Who played John Lennon for his brief appearance in the film?

JS: Mark Lindsay Chapman, who’s a talented British stage actor.

I was busy multitasking in pre-production and listening to a casting tape for the part. I’d gone through many people, but then I heard Mark Lindsey Chapman and it stopped and rewound the tape. I selected him then… it was just weird coincidence that he has a similar name to the killer. I didn’t want a look-alike, Mark Lindsey Chapman had the feeling of John.

ANY THING FOR A BUCK....DIRT BAG!!!!

Labels: , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

An Interesting Post From An IMDB User & My Feelings Regarding It.

I was once again visiting the IMDB on the Chapter 27 page and there was an interesting post from an IMDB user on the message board that is on that particular page from that movie.Apparently,her post does indeed hit it right on the money about how we on this board feel about John Lennon and also how we on this board feel about his murderer.Below is that person's post and my feelings regarding what she posted:

I apologize for the mere mentioning of his name but I feel that I should share it word for word to bring you the ultimate in authenticity.

Close This Chapter

"The last thing that we need is for Chapman to receive any more 'celebrity staus' for his murder of John Lennon. Yes, he's mentally ill and is most likely criminally insane- and should never see the light of day. We should just go back to remembering John Lennon and his legacy and keep Chapman in his forgettable status."

Below is what I expressed regarding it:

"Regarding what you said above about closing this chapter,I have only one thing to say:

''YOU REALLY ROCK!''

Your sentiments are my sentiments exactly and I wish people would forget about that guy and preserve the memory and legacy of a man who definitely was "One Of The Greatest Men Who Ever Lived" who is still loved and remembered by man in the world to this very day.Again,we need to preserve the as well as remember the memory and legacy of John Lennon and forget about the man who murdered him.THAT MAN does not deserve any fame or notoriety.He did what he did and we should forget about only him and keep remembering John Lennon.

However,I do disagree with your sentiments regarding the murderers state of mind.I do not think that the murderer was mentally ill or criminally insane.I think that he was legally sane at the time he murdered Lennon.In fact,he came to New York with the intention of murdering Lennon a year before he actually did it but changed his mind.Here's why I feel that he was legally same at the time he murdered Lennon:

1)He did travel to New York a year prior to the actual murder with the intent to kill John Lennon,but changed his mind.

2)He waited almost all day at the Dakota for Lennon to show up.While waiting,he talked to passers-by and even greeted John & Yoko's son Sean,who was 5 years old at the time,while he and his nanny were walking together and not only shook his little hand but also had the nerve to pat Sean on the head.

3)He simply called out "Mr.Lennon" when he saw him and immediately started shooting at 10:50p.m. on December 8th 1980.

4)He even watched John Lennon die in front of the Dakota proudly and did not make any attempt to flee.

5)When the Dakota doorman approached him and asked "Do You Realize What You Just Did?" He answered "Yes,I Just Shot John Lennon." without any apparent emotion.

6)He just sat there reading a book while Yoko Ono cried in pain and begged for John to stay alive while help was arriving.He did not even budge.

7)He never even bothered to ask if John Lennon was okay nor was he concerned when the news reported that he was dead.

8)At his arraignment,he declined psychiatric evaluations of any kind and simply pleaded GUILTY to the crime and willfully admitted what he did after his plea.Again,he showed no remorse nor any apparent emotion.He just simply said everything with a cold hearted attitude.

Hopefully,this proves my point.If not,then "Oh Well. I Tried."

But again,I do agree that we should preserve and remember the legacy and memory of John Lennon and let his murderer fade from public memory.

I just hope that he dies soon.That way,we can all breathe a sigh of relief and say to ourselves "John Lennon Can Finally Rest In Peace. His Murderer Is Finally Dead."

Thanks for posting"

I just wanted to share this. I am glad that we are not alone in our feelings for this worthless excuse for a movie,which I hope is forgotten pretty soon.

Thanks again Howard for your posts.
Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

How Chapter 27 will kill Peace Arch Entertainment.

You may never read this story in the Wall Street Journal and it will not likely become a case study at Harvard Business School, but over the course of the next few week, we will begin to document how one immoral decision can destroy an organization. The decision by John Flock and Peace Arch Entertainment to finance Chapter 27 will prove to be their undoing. There is no escaping Karma, so while the Board of Directors at Peace Arch Entertainment treat the shareholders of the company like mushrooms (kept in the dark and fed shit), the company will wither and die based on one horrible decision.
The first example of Karma and the "Chapter 27 Effect" (as we will refer to it going forward), is the fact that the two major distributors bidding for "Delirious" have disappeared, did they leave because "Delirious" was not a good film NO, they have walked away because they have decided not to do business with Peace Arch Entertainment (PAE), solely on the basis that they did not have the ethics to refrain from "Chapter 27". The feeling was that this decision was so improper that they would prefer to "Do business elsewhere".
Listed below are some quotes from John Flock - president of PAE and the man responsible for Chapter 27. Listen as he sounds so confident regarding "Delirious" (by the way Steve Buscemi is the MAN), but is not confident know as his stock price has fallen 20% since the Sundance Hype.

"We are confident that the influential audiences at Sundance will find 'Delirious' particularly worthwhile," said John Flock, President of Peace Arch Entertainment. "Tonight's premier is yet another noteworthy validation of Peach Arch's ability to produce and acquire a wide variety of top quality entertainment projects that can provide a solid return on investment."

"Delirious" will have its North American premiere tonight in Sundance's exclusive Spectrum Program, which pays tribute to the abundance of compelling voices and the creative spirit of independent filmmaking.

"Delirious" had its world premiere at the 54th Annual San Sebastian International Film Festival in Spain, where it received three sought-after prizes. Writer-director Tom DiCillo ("Living In Oblivion" "Double Whammy" "The Real Blonde") earned both the Silver Shell for Best Director and the Jury Prize for Best Screenplay, and the film also received the SIGNIS Award from the festival's global jury.

The decision to finance Chapter 27 will be this companies undoing, watch as deal continue to fall apart as they press forward with this film.

The most incredible thing about this study is the fact that Peace Arch had some legitimate potential, if they decide to bury Chapter 27, never release it on dvd, take the loss, and apologize to the fans of John Lennon, this could all go away.

Hell after a sincere apology and the destruction of Chapter 27, I would be willing to increase my holdings in Peace Arch Entertainment (I currently hold 1 share of stock, this is to ensure that I am privy to all company info. including an invitation to the annual shareholders meeting)

Not a likely scenario, but continue to watch this company fall apart, and we will be here to document every little piece.

F....Jackie and Stuttering John
Whaaaaaaa..........I'm back on heroin...Whaaaaaaaa

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Monday, January 29, 2007

The greatest Chapter 27 review yet..PAE.. feel that





This is the critique from the Utah Chronicle, probably the finest review er have found to date. Sent to us by our friends at nordbergstudios.com. That for keeping us posted on this one.

I want the shareholders of Peace Arch Entertainment, Jared Leto, and FireCrotch to really enjoy this one. Not to mention Jarrett Schaefer.

The Ugly (what better way to address Chapter 27)

For Jarrett Schaefer's "Chapter 27," Jared Leto put on 70 pounds to play Mark David Chapman, the man who shot and killed John Lennon in 1980. It's a full-bodied performance in every sense of the phrase; Leto wheezes and sinks into his doughy double-chin like a sunglasses-clad Stay-Puff Marshmallow-Man speaking whacked-out inner monologues in a breathy, one-note squeak that grates on the nerves. It's sad that Leto's commitment was wasted on a character that is so damned annoying.

Instead of approaching Chapman from a psychoanalytical perspective, Schaefer simply watches him during the week leading up to Lennon's murder. I understand that Schaefer is trying to make the point that we can't ever really understand why a person does something as insane as murdering another person in cold blood, but why pick someone as dull as Chapman to make this point? It's an approach that turns "Chapter 27" into a long slog through redundant schizophrenia and not much else.

HOW MUCH DID YOU ENJOY THAT....OH BABY....FEEL THAT

Here's the link for the entire article, its worth reading

Chapter 27 has about as much chance for distribution as Artie Lange has of living past 40.

PEACE

F...Jackie and Stuttering John

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Yet Another Negative IMDB user review on Chapter 27.When Will It End If It Ever Does?

First,I again want to thank Howard for his hard work and dedictaion to this message board.I appreciated his intelligent post from yesterday and I hope that it straightens everything out and puts those with negative attitudes in their place.

I was once again visiting the IMDB and I just caught the latest negative review on the film Chapter 27.It just keeps getting worse for this sad excuse for a movie that practically has not received no positive review as far as we know.The review was posted last night.If any of you have not caught it as of yet,below is where you wil find it for your reading pleasure in it's exact words:

Ugh.... slow and painful

"I saw the Sundance premiere of this film, and I want 2 hours of my life back. This film gives no insight to the killer, or why he did what he did. Jared Leto put on a ton of weight for this film(he lets you know it by spending too much time in his saggy white underpants, Ugh). Lindsay Lohan's character was nonexistant, so much that you wonder why she was in the film at all. Besides the character of Chapman, no one else is on screen long enough for you to care or have interest in them and after about 20 min the story doesn't tell us anything new about Chapman's character. The most interesting part of the film is that Mark Chapman(no relation) played John Lennon and having that be the most interesting thing about your film is sad."

There you go. With so much negative reactions be they critics or by users of the IMDB, we are learning all too well that Chapter 27 is a wrong number not just for the actors who wasted their talent in this worthless excuse for a film but mainly for Jarrett P. Schaeffer, the guy who wrote and directed this unloveable bad movie that seemingly is the unwritten chapter from Catcher In The Rye. I wonder what J.D.Salinger would say if he saw this movie or even heard of it. If this is supposed to be the continuation of Catcher In The Rye, then I don't know what the ending is going to be like and I don't want to think about it.

The only question on the inquiring minds of the contributors is "When Will It End If It Ever Does?" That is a good question, isn't it? It looks like that it is not going to end at least for now. But if it does end, we can breathe a sigh of relief and what happens after that remains to be seen.

It looks like that it won't get better in the forseeable future. No, I don't think it ever will be.
Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Responding to negative comments regarding the Chapter 27 boycott


For anyone to believe that the people involved in this website are "fascist" or against "Free Speech" are truly misguided. I for one have no problem with this movie being made, I have a problem with the reason for it being made. Chapter 27 was written and produced for one reason and one reason only. To make money, anyone who believes this film was made to do a psychological study of an insane murderer has no clue. Do you believe the shareholders of Peace Arch Entertainment, a publicly traded company, could care less why MDC killed John Lennon.
As for Free Speech (by the way, we have NEVER deleted any negative comments on this blog), not only are many of us financial supporters of EFF.org, but we volunteer our time to ensure that the government leaves what little is left of the First Amendment and citizens rights to privacy. Secondly, if you notice at the bottom of most of our posts , we offer a few "catch phrases" from the Howard Stern Show. You are not reading the writings of an uptight group of people, we just feel the need to educate people, before giving their hard earned dollars to the greedy pricks involved in Chapter 27.
Below is a segment from one of our original posts at Boycott Chapter 27. , I believe it clearly states some of the reasons for our passion against Chapter 27:

Let me explain some of the motivation behind boycottchapter27.org and the petition that many of you dismiss out of ignorance. A boycott does not equal censorship (censorship by definition can only be carried out by a government or governing body). There is no correlation and obviously the correlation is inverse (as a boycott is the truest form of free speech), this boycott is being presented for 3 reasons.
The first of which is to work to cause any economic hardship possible for the company responsible for glorifying the murder of John Lennon, it's not being done for Yoko, or to damper free speak, only to spread the word of the greed being perpetrated by "Peace" Arch Entertainment.
The second is education; the teenagers of today are about to be sold a film utilizing "stars" (Lohan and Leto), with no understanding of just who was destroyed by this maniac (other than...Wasn't he the singer in the Beatles?, I think my mom listened to them).
Third, if this film and boycott can be used as a stepping-stone for a message of peace (especially to youngsters) or peaceful demonstration then perhaps all is not lost. Many of you pose yourself as intellectuals, but when you put down individuals attempting to make a difference, that my friends is not very intelligent.

Be sure we will continue to press on.... REMEMBER JOHN LENNON, NOT HIS KILLER!!!
BOYCOTT CHAPTER 27

PEACE

F....Jackie and Stuttering John
Hiii Fred

Labels: , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Has anyone found a positive review of Chapter 27

This is amazing....in a world full of varying opinions, we may have found something all the critics can agree on....Chapter 27 just plain SUCKS.

This review was just found on Cinematical.com, read, smile and enjoy!!!

I hate to borrow material from another film critic, but a colleague of mine offered the following words after we finished watching Chapter 27: "It's like a feature-length version of De Niro's 'You talkin' to me' speech from Taxi Driver -- only without Scorsese, Schrader or De Niro." I repeat that sentence because it perfectly encapsulates my own opinion on the deadly dull and seriously dreary Chapter 27, a movie that promises to offer some insight into why Mark David Chapman, on one chilly night in 1980, shot the beloved John Lennon to death. But after 90-some minutes of J.P. Schaefer's writing/directing debut, I was no closer to understanding Chapman's motivations than I was 90 minutes earlier. I know it has something to do with J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye, but any other specifics are lost beneath waves of babble, tedium and pretense.

It just keeps getting better.....read on.

Lead actor Jared Leto earned himself a producer's credit on Chapter 27, and it's blatantly obvious from the first few frames of the flick that the young actor really, ahem, beefed up for the role. And Leto wants you to know it, which is why we see Chapman parading around in his tighty-whities for two or three scenes. Jared might as well look directly into the camera lens and scream "Look how much weight I gained for this role!" To make matters worse, Leto (who, to be fair, has done some excellent work in movies like Panic Room, American Psycho and Requiem for a Dream) opts to brandish a rather nasally high-pitched squeak of a voice, which makes Chapter 27 feel like a straight-faced parody of Capote. And I don't think that's what Leto and Company were going for.

So the bulk of the flick sees Leto as Chapman walking through the park, lazing in hotel rooms and standing around outside John Lennon's apartment building, which is where he occasionally stops to talk with other fans -- but mostly he just wanders around while his voice-over narration rambles on about Holden Caulfield blah blah and John Lennon yadda yadda. It's drier than burnt toast and about as tasty. Popping up randomly (and to no discernible effect, really) in front of the apartment building are Jude (Lindsay Lohan) and Paul (Judah Friedlander), but aside from a few brief volleys of vapid chit-chat with the eventual murderer, they sure don't do a whole heckuva lot. (For the record, Friedlander delivers the only interesting line in the whole movie while Lohan wisely underplays her skimpily-written role.)

On the whole Chapter 27 feels like thirty pages of script in a 90-minute frame, and a vanity project for an actor willing to go the extra distance even if the screenplay doesn't really warrant all the effort. I was hoping to gain some insight as to who Mark Chapman actually was, and why he committed such a horrible crime; I walked out of Chapter 27 still wondering who the guy was -- and why the hell he liked Catcher in the Rye so damn much

VARIETY - Every Executive working in film distribution read this one..
Thanks Don "THE MAN" Murphy

"Chapter 27" peers into the mind of a real-life, insane killer and finds almost nothing of interest. In order to play John Lennon's assassin Mark David Chapman, actor Jared Leto gained some 70 pounds. Seemingly following his lead, the pic itself is heavy, lethargic, and exasperating. Whether this is due to the producer-star or due to debuting writer-director Jarrett Schaefer -- or both -- this dramatization of Chapman's days in New York City leading up to the shooting yields little insight or entertainment value. Despite the presence of Lindsay Lohan (in a thankless support role), theatrical success looks about as likely as a 21st-century Beatles reunion.

Flying in from his Hawaii home, the creepy, awkward Chapman installs himself in a YMCA, then a Sheraton, spending most of his time hanging out in front of the fabled Dakota building hoping to get an autograph from resident Lennon. But since he's brought a handgun, he presumably has a darker agenda from the start.

His repetitive verbal and voiceover ramblings show his obsessions with the Beatles and "Catcher in the Rye." He seems to think he's Holden Caulfield, sworn to avenge himself on all the "phonies" of the world, including ex-Beatle Lennon.

But since there's no background given in screenplay (a brief conversation with his unseen wife back home is the only clue to his prior life), protag's motivations are left blank.

Instead, pic gives a whopping dose of Leto with a black dye-job, pasty skin, glasses and double chin, whisper-talking in a rather actorish way, finding many excuses to doff his shirt so aud can appreciate his "Raging Bull"-style sacrifice for art. Chapman emerges more boring and irksome than scary.

Chapman meets Jude (Lohan), a local who also spends time hovering outside the Dakota, hoping for a glimpse of or word with her idol. As played in Lohan's usual likeable, naturalistic style, it strains credibility that this normal young woman would spend even a minute befriending such an obvious weirdo.

Though preem screening clocked in 16 minutes shorter than run-time given in Sundance program, "Chapter 27" still feels low on incident and high in tedium, with ideas beginning to repeat themselves halfway through. On rare occasions when something does happen -- notably when Chapman hires a prostitute -- it's a terribly obvious stab at pathos or menace.

Brief news clips reporting Lennon's death and the widespread public mourning provide some respite from pic's unrewardingly narrow focus.

While this sort of thing has certainly been done well before --"Taxi Driver" being the definitive example -- Leto and Schaefer haven't found a way of making their subject's mental illness compelling.

Feature is pro but uninspired in all departments, with Anthony Marinelli's competent but off-mark orchestral score just one more way in which "Chapter" fails to lend a seemingly sure-shot story any distinctive personality or drive.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Saturday, January 27, 2007

A Little Bit More Regarding The Dismal Reception For Chapter 27

I have just read Howard's latest post today regarding the dismal reception that the film Chapter 27 received at it's Sundance premiere.Thanks Howard for your words of encouragement on this board.They are truly appreciated and they are also a boost of confidence and courage that many of those in the world today lack.Thanks again Howard.

I have a little bit more to share regarding the dismal reception that this worthless excuse of a movie has received.Three days ago,somebody posted a message on the IMDB inquiring on when a trailer is supposed to be coming out.The film premiered at Sundance about three days ago and this person was wondering if there is going to be a trailer for this film.Well,as we can all see by the dismal negative reception that this inauspicious debut by Jarrett P. Schaffer has received,it looks like that there will possibly be NO trailer for this film.I even expressed my thoughts regarding this on the subject on IMDB.Below is where you can read it:

"Apparently, it looks like that there might not be a trailer for the film judging by the negative reviews the film received at it's Sundance premeire. Since this film has not found a distributor as of yet and looks like it might not find one, it looks like that there will be NO trailers for this waste of a movie that was a waste of time, talent, film & money. It's sad but as Frank Sinatra once sang "That's Life!" "

Apparently with this dismal and negative reception that this film has received,it looks like that we will not see Chapter 27 among the films listed to be shown at any movie theatre anywhere in the USA. The only thing I can say about this is an often quoted phrase that is used whenever somebody does not get what they are expecting from all their wasteful hard work on something.

A little note to Jarrett P. Schaeffer,if he ever reads this,regarding this really sad turn of events at the Sundance film festival that his film received:

"BETTER LUCK NEXT TIME,BOY!!!!"

That is all I can say to Mr. Schaffer.

But for the world around us,there is a double edged sword here. For the people who expected this film to go anywhere after Sundance, "We're Sorry! But You Can't Win Them All,LOSERS!" But for those of us who worked hard to get the message across and our victory regarding this boycott drawing near as we all continue to hope for the best through our continuous hard work,all I can say is,in the immortal words of Jackie Gleason, "How Sweet It Is!!"

Let's continue to work hard at this and fight. The more we do. The more positive results can be accomplished. It won't be long when we can say "Let The Celebrations Begin!"
Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

USA today, Boston Globe, and 2 IMDB reviews...Chapter 27 may not make DVD




WOW...Chapter 27's reviews have far exceeded our expectations!!!

This film is on its way from Sundance straight to the trash...We may not even see it released on DVD the way things are going for Peace Arch with this Piece of Crap!!!!

USA TODAY..."live from Sundance on Chapter 27"

Strange name coincidence in John Lennon murder film

In Chapter 27, Jared Leto portrays John Lennon's murderer Mark David Chapman in a story about his mental breakdown in the days preceding the 1980 slaying.

In what the filmmakers acknowledge was a spooky coincidence, the actor chosen to play Lennon in two brief but climactic scenes was a Los Angeles performer named Mark Lindsay Chapman. There is no relation.

Writer-director Jarrett Schaefer says, "When I first heard an actor by that name gave us a tape, I thought it was a joke." He watched the tape for the first time without noticing, and was impressed by the performer. Then he rewound the footage and caught the name.

He decided to hire him anyway. "It's not the easiest thing to be like, the actor I want to play John Lennon is named Mark Lindsay Chapman – but there it was," he said.

He says the actor got the role because he portrayed the edgier side of Lennon, without making the former Beatle seem too saint-like.

"There are a lot of John Lennon look-alikes out there, and I looked at a bunch of them. But a feel-alike is what I wanted," Schaefer said. "Most of the people who make their living looking like John and playing his music portray him in a way where he's six-inches above the ground, as a legend. I was more interested in portraying his cynical one-liners, he was famous for having a chip on his shoulder and saying exactly what he means."

The filmmaker says he wrote to the Lennon family to make them aware of the film, rather than risk them learning from a newspaper. Schaefer says they did not contact him back.

Chapter 27 was named after a non-existent final part of the novel The Catcher in the Rye, which the killer obsessed over. Both actor and director say it was designed to explore the killer, not celebrate him.

Lindsay Lohan co-stars in the movie as a Lennon fan who befriended the murderer. The actress cancelled plans to attend Sundance after entering rehab last week to fight unspecified addictions. Schaefer did not mention her in the post-screening crew acknowledgments.
---------------------------------------------------------
BOSTON GLOBE

"Chapter 27," by contrast, wastes the talents of Jared Leto on a story that simply didn't need telling : the murder of John Lennon as told from the point of view of killer Mark David Chapman. The actor gained more than 65 pounds for the role and convincingly transforms himself into a bloated, pale sociopath whose obsessions include "The Catcher in the Rye" and the Bible in addition to the ex-Beatle. Lindsay Lohan is good as a fellow Beatlemaniac, too, but writer-director Jarrett Schaefer never convincingly explains the demons that drove Chapman. The result is an unpleasant act of cinematic rubbernecking that celebrates a deserved nonentity.

The festival prizes won't be handed out until tonight, but by Thursday evening, as "Chapter 27" was having its premier e screening in the Eccles Theatre, there was already a sense that this year's Sundance was over. At a quiet dinner in the mountains that night, held by a prominent buyer and attended by various members of the press and entertainment community, the talk wasn't of films just see
------------------------------------------
IMDB reader reviews:

There is not much that could be said for this awful misfire of a film. The sadly untalented Leto is thrust upon the screen, and at the viewers, in a performance that is so bad it isn't even worth laughing at. It's as if Leto was attempting to play Travis Bickle via Forrest Gump. The Direction was also flawed, and relayed too much on Scorsese's Classic Taxi Driver, but I give him credit for addressing the stoic audience at the Sundance Premiere during the post screening Q&A. I hope he has learned from the mistakes on this picture, and is able to deliver something more impressive his next time around. I'm trying to be generous. Lindsey Lohan was the one shining light in an otherwise unwatchable film.

and

Just caught the world premiere at Sundance tonight. At the Question and Answer with the director and lead actor, the audience asked two categories of questions. Either, "what drove you to make this movie" and "what did you learn about Chapman that is not already known" on one hand or "how many pounds did Jared Lito gain/lose to play the part" on the other. The actor Jared had more to say about the hardship of the physical aspects of this role than the director Jared had to say about the "why" of the movie other than some vague attempt to humanize Mark David Chapman and to show that his motivation apparently came from his sick adherence to the words of John Lennon and Salinger's Catcher In The Rye.

But such is already common knowledge gleaned from any standard article written about Chapman's murder of Lennon along with his last few days up until the shooting. The director admitted to no contact from the Lennon family or even with Chapman himself--why humanize someone you don't even care to meet? So, the audience wondered, what was the point? No wonder the most interesting thing to the audience the film was Jared the actor's weight commitment to the role.

Excellent acting throughout, especially Ms. Lohan's work, and solid technical film-making. But nothing interesting, thoughtful, insightful, exposing or illuminating to see.

A film about a madman causing pain and grief to a someone and their family, or in this case to millions worldwide, that sheds light as to how such person got to such a state is one thing, but one that that does nothing but execute a common knowledge play-by-play of the killer's last few days, a "Passion of the Chapman" if you will--and even that gives this film too much credit--does not seem to have a reason except possibly dull sensationalism. I say dull because, if not, wouldn't such a film have been made over twenty years ago?

A well done, well acted wasteful drag of a movie.

F....Jackie and Stuttering John
Hiiii Fred



Labels: , , , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Friday, January 26, 2007

NY Magazine on Chapter 27..it just keeps getting worse

Just one more nod, people are clearly outraged by Chapter 27, and the critics are not holdinding back. Peace Arch Entertainment is feeling it tonight. All the hype built in to the stock price of PAE...it's instant Karma time...get ready to lose your asses!!

Sundance Report: Mark David Chapman Pic Doesn't Endear Filmmaker to Beatle-Loving Throngs

Schaefer at his film's Sundance premiere last night
.

When filmmaker Jarrett "no morals, money hungry, shit head" Schaefer took the stage at Park City's Prospector Theater this morning for a question-and-answer session after a screening of his debut film, Chapter 27, a glimpse into the deranged mind of MDC (DIRTBAG KILLER!!) — played by a plumped-up Jared Leto — during his days in New York prior to the murder of John Lennon, there was an obvious thing to ask. Where were you when John Lennon was shot? "I was 1," he said. "My dad said I was watching football." The audience laughed. It was the first laughter heard in the last 90 minutes.
Chapter 27 is a serious and terrifying film. But Lennon fans have been skeptical of Schaefer's motives. Is he trying to show MDC in a sympathetic light? Does he think Lennon's killer should finally be paroled? "Jarrett received some hostile questions at last night's screening," said Anthony Marinelli, the film's composer, just outside the auditorium doors. "They want to know what Yoko Ono thinks. I think this screening was warmer. This guy is a disgrace, guaranteed he will never have a career in the movie business." Schaefer gets the Yoko question a lot. "I'm not going into that," he said, sitting in a snack bar later. Will some people always criticize him for showing Chapman as something other than entirely evil? Schaefer gave the shortest response of the festival. "Yes."

Thanks Again for the added bandwith. The boycott of Chapter 27 and Peace Arch Entertainment continues to GROW...support our supporters
NORDBERG STUDIOS - LENNON FANS - GOOD PEOPLE


F...Jackie and Stuttering John
Hiiii Fred

Labels: , , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Boycott Chapter 27 wants to offer a special thanks to Nordberg Studios




Our inside Hollywood sources had informed us that Nordberg Studios of NYC turned down working with Peace Arch Entertainment on Chapter 27 because they felt so strongly about honoring Yoko and Paul's request to keep John Lennons killer from obtaining the fame he desired. When we called to thank them for being "Good and Honorable People", they donated additional bandwidth to handle our increased traffic flow (Due to the Boycott Chapter 27 demonstrations at Sundance.) We highly recommend them for any audio production needs you may have. We look forward to working with them in the near future.

And as I'm sure most of you have seen in our last 2 posts the initial reviews out of Sundance have been disastrous for Peace Arch regarding Chapter 27. It appears at this point that they will NOT get a US distribution deal!!!!! Next we go to work on blocking Chapter 27 DVD sales!!!!

F...Jackie and Stuttering John
Hiiiii Fred


Labels: , , , , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

This Just In From MTV.com

I have another latest bit about Chapter 27 from MTV.com. It is courtesy of Josh Horowitz who is at the moment at Sundance and this is another of the latest regarding that film. Of course,it's really not a full review. It's just a few words by Mr. Horowitz and a bit about the audience reaction.Below is where you can find it:

10:34p.m.

"It's a Sundance miracle.I have found the theatre(with some help from a gas station attendant) showing "Chapter 27",and what's more,I haven't even missed a frame of it. This is the very first screening of "Chapter 27", a much hyped about John Lennon's assassin NHJKGBTYRZUI (Jared Leto) in the days leading up to the Beatle's murder. Lindsay Lohan in a supporting role does not hurt the curiosity factor. After seeing a couple of movies at Sundance you learn the protocol awfully quick. The credits come up as the film concludes and the audience pays their respects, often with raucous applause. This is not a review of "Chapter 27", so I'll out my many thoughts on the flick, but suffice it to say, ''only a FEW people applauded at the end and I wasn't one of them.'' This can't be the last flick I see here. It can't end like this."

There you go. Yet another bit about this poor excuse of a film that is not even getting any favorable reviews at the festival. It's a wonder that Mr. Schaeffer even made the film in the first place and it's also another wonder why those behind the scenes at the Sundance Film Festival gave this film and it's maker the green light to premiere at the festival in the first place when we are seeing that NOBODY is interested in this film or why Lennon's murderer even murdered Lennon in the first place.

Chapter 27's days are numbered as we speak. It should not be long when the festival is over and this film does not get any takers in the distribution arena, which we all hope on this board does not happen at all. If it does not have any takers that would release it to theatres, we can declare victory and let the celebrations begin. If it does, which, again, we hope does not happen, we can hope that this movie BOMBS and disappears soonafter it reaches theatres. We can still win it either way.

Let's hope for the best. It looks like we're winning, so far. Let's keep it up.

AND MORE:

SEAN LENNON and LINDSAY LOHAN's friendship is at risk after the musician's decision to go public with his feelings about her "tacky" new film.
The son of late BEATLE JOHN LENNON hates the idea of Lohan's new movie CHAPTER 27, in which she plays a friend of his father's killer MARK DAVID CHAPMAN, played by JARED LETO.
In one scene the young Sean meets Chapman in Central Park, New York - less than a mile from where the deranged fan shot his father dead outside the Dakota Building.
And Lennon is far from impressed with the film's premise, stating, "It's a tacky thing to make a film about.
"Lindsay was my friend, so I don't want to hurt her feelings... I think she felt that she understood but she'd already agreed to do it." And speaking to US TV news show THE INSIDER before checking into rehab, Lohan revealed she knew all about her friend's distaste for Chapter 27.
She said, "He's my friend but he's not supporting what went on (on the set).
We respect each other... and I don't support what happened to John Lennon."

What's even more ironic is that the man who took the life of John Lennon actually had the nerve to pat Sean Lennon on the head when his nanny took him for a walk. Little did Sean Lennon, who was 5 years of age at the time, realize that this same man would murder his father in cold blood hours later. Pretty scary, huh?

Yet another winning review for Chapter 27 and Peace Arch Entertainment:

"Chapter 27" relies on the concept that following an insane person around for three days will provide you with great insight into his character. But if all the character in question does is make "Catcher in the Rye" references and speak in an annoying whisper that's supposed to be sinister, it doesn't really offer any insight into why he killed John Lennon.
Jared Leto stars as Mark Chapman, who shot John Lennon outside the Dakota apartment building on Dec. 8, 1980. With the weight gain, makeup and glasses, Leto does actually look quite a bit like Chapman, but that means little in terms of the actual performance, which is limited to the script's depth and scope.

As Leto's voiceover—a southern-tinged, raspy whisper that blathers nonstop throughout the film—tells us, "Chapter 27" isn't about Chapman's childhood or any of that, just three days 'round about Christmas when something happened to him. The time frame is clearly a reference to the J.D. Sallinger (26-chapter) novel that writer/director J.P. Schaefer mirrors his film after in the same way that Chapman modeled his personality. But the film lacks the thrust and scope of "Catcher in the Rye." Chapman finds New York City to be dirty and sin-filled, moves to a new hotel, stands outside Dakota again, eats some food, goes to the Dakota again, etc.

From what I can tell, the film is generally accurate regarding the events of Dec. 8. But I got as much out of it as I did by looking up Chapman on Wikipedia. Chapman's earlier encounters on the day of the shooting, first with young Sean Lennon and his nanny, later with John himself, are there simply because they're expected to be. Oh, and he liked "The Wizard of Oz."

Lindsay Lohan plays a Lennon obsessive who befriends Chapman while loitering outside the Dakota. She elects to spend much more time with him than any reasonable person would. It's not fun to listen to some guy with a poor grasp on "The Catcher in the Rye" imitate Holden Caulfield and talk about his dislike of phonies all day, and a good-looking woman-about-town would have no need to put up with it.

The film suggests that if any of the people who spend hours letting Chapman annoy them endlessly would have kept letting him annoy them, the murder might not have been committed. Even for an obsessive fan, the guy is a bad conversationalist, unpredictable and rude. That anyone would allow this new guy into their lives is a complete stretch. And if there's a reason to make a film about him, "Chapter 27" doesn't reveal it.

Labels: , , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

More early reviews of Chapter 27 from Sundance

You shareholders in Peace Arch Entertainment (PAE)will be getting the Karma you deserve from attempting to profit from "Chapter 27" - the movie looking to profit from John Lennons death, humanizing his murderer. Please read below....and cry a river...dirtbags

"Hounddog," the simply awful movie in which 12-year-old Dakota Fanning’s character is raped, has no buyers.

"No one wants it after the terrible reviews," one distributor told me, just as we were sitting down to see another disaster, J.P. Schaefer’s "Chapter 27."

Indeed, the people associated with The Weinstein Company, IFC Films and First Look were among those who instantly agreed that they had no interest in "Hounddog."

At this rate, this exercise in bad taste may wind up being a DVD collector’s item. Same thing for "Chapter 27," from which many fled before it ended in the two audiences that have seen it.

Meanwhile, the producers of "Hounddog" trotted out 12-year-old Fanning yesterday to defend the film in places like USA Today and at another press conference. It’s come to that, apparently. The people who should be answering questions, however, are Fanning’s parents, and the parents of the other children in the film.
Sounds like the beginning of the END for Jared Leto and Lindsey Lohan, should have thought about something besides money, when you decided to do Chapter 27..HAHAHAHAH

F....Jackie and Studdering John
Whhaaaaa...My movie sucked....Whaaaaa

Labels: , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Thanks FOX...Bashing Chapter 27 and Peace Arch

This is one of the finest articles I have found on Chapter 27!!! FOX...not a big fan of your news channel...but I love your views on Chapter 27!!!

Lennon Murder a Bore in New Film

It’s not enough that John Lennon was assassinated in 1980 by MDC. Now filmmaker — I use the word advisedly — J.P. Schaefer has managed to kill him again. He’s also made a boring, unreleasable movie that no one will ever see, except a few members of the press.

“Chapter 27” is probably more notable — as I noted a few months ago — for its wholesale lifting of passages from J.D. Salinger’s classic novel “The Catcher in the Rye.” I can’t believe Salinger’s lawyers aren’t already exploring ways to penalize the people behind this piece of drivel for stealing sections of the writer’s work.

The movie was screened on Tuesday night for the first time. But I’m told it’s been rejected by other film festivals before finally gaining berth here at Sundance.

It doesn’t really matter. Most of the audience struggled to remain awake during the film’s lethargic 90 minutes.

Not much happens. Chapman is played pasty (PERFECT DESCRIPTION) by actor Jared Leto — who looks like a spent a month eating hero sandwiches and downing milkshakes.

He’s adopted a Southern accent for the role, and we get to hear it a lot, since almost all of the movie is either Chapman talking to himself or at others in a monotone.

There’s no explanation for Chapman’s feelings about Lennon other than he thinks he’s a “phony” for having several homes.

Chapman just goes on and on about Salinger’s signature hero, Holden Caulfield, to the point of inanity.

If Chapman thought anything else about Lennon, we just aren’t privy to it. Schaefer gets an "F" for not doing any research or homework.

There are a couple of other actors in "Chapter 27" -- the title refers to what would have been one more chapter in the novel, although this is not made clear.

Lindsay Lohan is thoroughly wasted in a bit part as a Beatle fan who hangs around the Dakota building in New York City, where Lennon lived, and is friendly with Sean Lennon’s nanny.

Judah Friedlander has the thankless part of a paparazzo whom Schaefer imagined chatted up Chapman in the hours right before he shot Lennon dead.

And the shooting is right there in the movie, if you’re wondering. Luckily, we only get to hear it, and Yoko Ono’s screams. Otherwise, Lennon is seen for a microsecond. And he’s played by the unfortunately named Mark Lindsay Chapman, the same actor who played Lennon in a TV movie years ago. Apparently once was not enough for this man.

Schaefer, whoever he is, has not made himself a welcome introduction to the indie film world. Not only is "Chapter 27" exploitative, it’s also dull, unimaginative, repetitive and without any redeeming cinematic qualities.

Leto, who started out with a promising career (“Requiem for a Dream,” “Prefontaine”) basically plays Chapman as a blob in tinted sunglasses. It’s the most inert performance in movies since Kevin Spacey wrecked “The Shipping News.”

As for Lohan, she’s better off in rehab than wasting her talents on this junk.
What could be better than this review of Chapter 27...MADE MY NIGHT!!!!

What timing...Just found another review of Chapter 27....
I love that this movie is getting BASHED!!!!!!
n December 8, 1980, Mark David Chapman shot John Lennon dead outside the Dakota Hotel. Not much is known about Lennon's assailant, but Chapter 27, a new movie by Jarrett Schaefer starring Jaret Leto as Chapman, tries its best to get into the killer's head. A big deal had been made about the amount of weight the normally rail-thin Leto put-on to play the part, following in the method acting footsteps of De Niro's Jake LaMotta in Raging Bull, but little else is known about the film, which is why many journalists and critics jumped on the early screening tonight at the Holiday Village. (The movie premieres at the festival on Thursday night at the Eccles.)

Those with high expectations for Chapter 27 may be slightly disappointed by the deliberately slow and subdued tone of the film, but also by how little of Chapman's life leading up to the shooting is covered. As the camera is kept trained on Leto's Chapman for the entirety of the film, it only really deals with the few days after his arrival in New York City leading up to the shooting. It's quite jarring the first time you see Leto, who is almost unrecognizable with his added weight and Roy Orbison glasses. Just to make sure no one thinks that this look was done with make-up or camera trickery, Schaefer includes many scenes of Chapman shirtless to Leto's new full-figured physique is prominently on display.

A few other characters show up, mainly as Chapman waits impatiently outside the Dakota Hotel for his hero to come out, the most prominent one being Lindsay Lohan as fellow Beatles fan Jude Stein, who makes friends with Chapman but gets scared off by his unstable demeanor. He also has a few encounters with Paul Goresh, a photographer played by Judah Friedlander who hopes to get pictures of Lennon to sell.

Even if you've never heard of Chapman (i.e. you're under the age of 16), it's obvious that he's not quite right, as the film is narrated mostly from the voices in his head as they make suggestions what he should do. His daily stalking of his idol seems innocent at first, merely wanting a copy of "Double Fantasy" autographed, but there's more at work inside this deranged man's head, as seen by his equal obsession with Salinger's "Catcher in the Rye."

Sadly, we really don't know what it is that drove him to kill Lennon--maybe he was hoping that the signed record he got would be more of a collector's item with Lennon dead?--and Chapter 27 doesn't make too much of an effort to try to enlighten us. It's commendable how Schaeffer took the well-documented facts leading up to the shooting and created this portrait, though the way things are shown almost verbatim may also be one of the fim's biggest faults. For instance, seeing Chapman encounter Sean Lennon and his nanny in Central Park mere hours before shooting Sean's father borders on the surreal, yet it's known to have happened.

The actual shooting takes place in a matter of seconds and after a bit of news footage and man-on-the-street interviews, the movie is over, never really answering the questions that many might have about what drove Chapman to this action.

Chapter 27 is worth seeing for Leto's performance (NOT) and the remarkable transformation that he went through to become Chapman (WOW...He ate food...what a star), but the film isn't that strong otherwise, and its slow, meandering pace tends to be its undoing.

F....Jackie and Studdering John
Whaaaaa....Stern doesn't return our calls....Whaaaa

Labels: , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Multi-Billion dollar bullshit from the producers of CHAPTER 27


This is a bit off of the Chapter 27 topic, but I felt it was necessary to help expose Peace Arch Entertainment. They are the company responsible for Chapter 27, this is a publicly traded company (PAE) which will eventually come under investigation by the SEC for spewing pure bullshit to its shareholders in hopes of one day "hitting it big", they will attempt this by putting out films with no moral or scrupples. These are the type of guys who would show moms execution on television for ratings. Case in point Chapter 27. When you read the article below, consider how much speculation and quite frankly - BULLSHIT, Peace Arch is spewing to potential investors. Would you invest your money with these people? Paying for analyst coverage and putting out films like Chapter 27?


Peace Arch Entertainment Presents Transcript of Latest Investor Conference Call Detailing Strategic Initiatives and Latest Progress

PLEASE READ BETWEEN THE LINES!!! BILLION DOLLAR DEALS....
CHAPTER 27...PLEASE

Company Details Record Q1 2007 Revenues, Leading Divisions and Featured Productions Targeting Multibillion-Dollar International Markets

TORONTO--(MARKET WIRE)--Jan 24, 2007 -- Peace Arch Entertainment Group Inc. (AMEX:PAE - News) (TSX:PAE.TO - News), an innovative film and television entertainment company, invites investors to view a transcript of the Company's recent investor conference call, where President John Flock and Chief Financial Officer Mara Di Pasquale recapped the Company's recent strategic milestones and recently reported record-breaking $11.3 million in revenues for fiscal Q1 2007.


During the conference call, Mr. Flock highlighted key elements of Peace Arch's strategy to capitalize on feature films, television and home entertainment content for distribution to worldwide markets.

"Our financials showed some very encouraging results this quarter that really demonstrate the progress we've made over the past year and validate our strategy for growth and increasing value for our shareholders," said Mr. Flock during the conference. "We've got a great management team in place, all of whom have been very successful in prior ventures in the entertainment industry and we're starting to see the strength of our integrated business model."

HOW CAN IT BE LEGAL FOR A CEO TO SPEW SUCH CRAP TO POTENTIAL INVESTORS?
Mr. Flock also discussed the Company's main achievements during Q1 2007, which include a new business venture agreement with CSC Global Technologies to launch a digital film distribution subsidiary and a sale of distribution rights outside North America to Sony Pictures Home Entertainment for the television program series "The Tudors." In addition, the Company was invited to premiere two recently completed films, "Chapter 27" and "Delirious," at the prestigious Sundance Film Festival, North America's top independent movie showcase.
Every time I read a statement from these guys at Peace Arch regarding Chapter 27, I wait in anticipation for the SEC investigation. That will be a fun day!!!!

Labels: , , , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Chapter 27's Jared Leto....A Class Act

Well kids this is your big star promoting Chapter 27 and representing Peace Arch Entertainment.
How can I refrain from calling the "star" of Chapter 27 anything more than an ASS

January 23, 2007 -- JARED Leto was in a foul mood at the Sundance Film Festival in Park City, Utah, on Saturday night. Leto, who was promoting "Chapter 27" (in which he plays John Lennon's assassin) picked fights with photographers and clubgoers in the VIP section of Tao at Harry O's. When a photographer from WireImage attempted to snap Leto's picture, the eyeliner- clad cad shouted, "No! No more, bro!" Leto walked out - but not before a "big guy" yanked at his long tresses. Leto "whipped off his hat with earflaps on and stepped up to the guy," said a spy. "They were yelling at each other." But no punches were thrown. And though Leto left, he came back a couple hours later to look for the guy. (Leto's rep didn't return calls.) Elsewhere: Sienna Miller kept the rumor mill churning by showing up at Tao with her new best friend Sean Combs one night and hitting the Heineken Lounge with Josh Hartnett the next. Miller's reps put wagging tongues on ice, however, saying that she's absolutely just a single girl having a good time with friends. Sunday night, the stars celebrated the premiere of her new flick, "Interview," at Delta Sky Lounge.

Boycott Chapter 27 - See you on the 25th Dirtbags!!!

F....Jackie and Studdering John
Howard , defend John Lennon and STOP Chapter 27

Labels: , , , ,

Apple Online Store Bloggers' Rights at EFF Blog Flux Pinger - reliable ping service. BBC America Shop

Monday, January 22, 2007

Klipsch Audio - your out!!! Supporting Chapter 27...Disgraceful


Klipsch Audio, your on our list. How could such an "intelligent" company support Peace Arch Entertainment and Chapter 27? We your consumers are very disappointed on your decision. Consider for a moment how many great John Lennon songs are played on your equipment. How much more additional speaker systems would be sold if John Lennon was still making music today? Bad Choice Klipsch.
Sundance -- Klipsch Audio Technologies announced today that it is hosting the upcoming post-premiere part